產品教學
產品教學
·
10分鐘
·
10分鐘
Karly chan
已更新
已更新
已更新
隨著遠端工作與居家辦公越來越受歡迎,雙螢幕需求大增。但你知道嗎?家裡閒置的 iPad 或 Android 平板,其實就是最好的平板第二螢幕解決方案!比起另外購買可攜式螢幕或外接顯示器,將平板當外接螢幕不僅省錢,還能充分利用現有設備。
無論是想實現 iPad 當外接螢幕提升 Mac 工作效率,或是讓 Android 平板當外接螢幕擴展 Windows 桌面,本文將完整解析 3 種免費的平板延伸螢幕方法,並分享 6 個實用的平板雙螢幕工作技巧,讓你的生產力立即翻倍!
在介紹具體方法前,先來了解為什麼平板外接螢幕能大幅提升工作效率。相較於傳統單螢幕作業,平板第二螢幕能為你帶來以下優勢:
桌面空間翻倍:透過平板延伸螢幕,顯示區域瞬間加倍,不再需要在多個視窗間頻繁切換
多工處理更順暢:一個螢幕看資料,另一個螢幕執行任務,工作流程更流暢
攜帶方便:比起笨重的外接螢幕,平板當外接螢幕輕便好攜帶,特別適合在咖啡廳或共享空間工作
成本效益高:不需要額外購買昂貴的可攜式螢幕,充分利用手邊的 iPad 或 Android 平板
畫質優異:現代平板螢幕解析度高,色彩表現好,作為第二螢幕毫不遜色
掌握正確的使用方法,才能真正發揮平板第二螢幕的威力。以下 6 個技巧,讓你的工作效率倍增:
多工處理最怕一直切換視窗。透過平板延伸螢幕,你可以把不同程式或資料檔案分別在兩個螢幕上開啟。例如主螢幕開啟 Word 檔案,平板外接螢幕顯示參考資料或網頁,畫面井然有序,不再手忙腳亂地找檔案。這種平板雙螢幕配置能大幅節省來回切換的時間,讓作業空間更加整潔有條理。對於需要同時監看多個系統或應用程式的工作者來說,這個功能簡直是救星!
在做文字或數據比對時,使用系統自帶的分割畫面功能常讓字變得太小、資料顯示不全,看得很吃力。利用平板當外接螢幕的方式,可以把兩個檔案各開在不同螢幕,字體維持正常大小、排版不亂,搭配修訂功能,更容易對照修改。
無論是 iPad 當外接螢幕比對 Excel 報表,或用三星平板當外接螢幕核對合約內容,這種設定都能讓校對工作更輕鬆準確。
剪影片時常需要邊找素材邊編輯?你可以將剪輯軟體 (如 Premiere Pro、Final Cut Pro) 放在主螢幕,平板第二螢幕開啟檔案管理器或素材資源庫,就能一鍵快速拖拉素材,減少反覆切換,大大提高剪輯效率。也可以將平板外接螢幕作為預覽區,主螢幕作為工作區,畫面更大細節看得更清晰。這種平板延伸螢幕的配置方式,讓專業創作者都讚不絕口。
要看長條型的影片、文檔或程式碼?把你的平板雙螢幕直立擺放,無論看直式影片或瀏覽長篇文字都更舒適、省下滑動的時間。這個技巧對於剪輯直屏短片、閱讀長篇論文或檢視程式碼特別實用。將 iPad 當外接螢幕並旋轉至直立模式,能完美展示一整頁 A4 文件或完整的程式碼片段,大幅提升閱讀體驗。
無論是寫論文、寫報告或編輯稿件,都少不了查資料。平板當第二螢幕能讓你左邊看原文資料、右邊對照翻譯文,一邊開著資料來源、一邊寫作,不用不斷來回切換視窗,還可以無縫將所需資訊進行複製、粘貼,提高效率。這種平板延伸螢幕的應用方式,特別適合學生撰寫論文、文字工作者整理稿件,或行銷人員製作企劃書,讓資料整合工作變得輕鬆許多。
在做繪圖、修圖或影片編輯時,平板當外接螢幕簡直是秘密武器!不論是放大細節檢視,或把 Photoshop、Illustrator 的特定工具面板移到另一台螢幕,都能讓工作空間更大更靈活。將 iPad 當外接螢幕顯示圖層面板和工具列,主螢幕專心創作,這種配置能讓設計師的創意發揮得淋漓盡致,用起來更順手。
想要一個跨平台、高畫質、設定簡單的平板第二螢幕方案嗎?DeskIn 是目前市場上最優質的選擇。這款免費的遠端桌面軟體,能夠輕鬆實現各種平板延伸螢幕需求。
DeskIn 是一款跨平台支援的專業遠端桌面軟體,能夠輕鬆串聯不同品牌、系統的裝置,提升裝置使用效率。它的免費延伸螢幕功能適用於所有操作系統之間任意延伸,具備以下特色:
全平台支援: 無論是 iPad 當外接螢幕連接 Mac/Windows,或 Android 平板當外接螢幕連接任何電腦,DeskIn 都能完美支援
超高畫質: 支援 4K 60FPS 高解析度,平板外接螢幕的顯示效果媲美專業顯示器
無感延遲體驗: 操作起來非常流暢,不會卡頓或延遲,特別適合需要即時互動的工作場景
無網路限制: 不需要在同一網路環境下,不受距離限制,隨時隨地都能使用平板延伸螢幕功能
簡單三步驟: 下載、登入、連接,3 分鐘內完成平板雙螢幕設定
除了基本的平板第二螢幕功能外,DeskIn 還提供強大的進階功能:
遠端控制: 用 iPad 或平板直接遠端控制你的電腦,外出也能處理緊急事務
檔案傳輸: 在電腦與移動裝置之間快速傳送檔案,ipad和電腦之間也可以傳檔,不需要透過雲端或傳輸線
螢幕鏡像: 將電腦畫面完整鏡像到平板外接螢幕上,適合簡報展示
遊戲串流: 甚至可以將電腦遊戲串流到平板上遊玩,還能在 iPad 上外接手把,或自訂 PC 遊戲按鈕組合,享受更流暢的操作體驗。
介面非常直覺,無需複雜設定,對於想要輕鬆實現 iPad 當外接螢幕或 Android 平板當外接螢幕的使用者來說,絕對是最佳選擇。
DeskIn 適用範圍:
✅ iPad 作為 Mac 的延伸螢幕
✅ iPad 作為 Windows 的延伸螢幕
✅ Android 平板作為 Mac 的延伸螢幕
✅ Android 平板作為 Windows 的延伸螢幕
想要透過 DeskIn 將平板當外接螢幕嗎?以下提供完整的操作教學,讓你輕鬆完成平板第二螢幕設定。
第一步:下載並註冊 DeskIn 帳號
首先在你的電腦和平板上下載 DeskIn 應用程式,然後註冊一個免費帳戶並分別登入。這個步驟非常簡單,無論你是要設定 iPad 當外接螢幕或 Android 平板當外接螢幕都一樣。

注意: 如果你是首次在新裝置登入,需要到註冊信箱完成驗證,這是為了保障帳戶安全。

第二步:啟動平板延伸螢幕功能
在電腦端 DeskIn 上點擊左邊選單「鏡像屏/擴展屏」,點擊「立刻進行螢幕擴展」選擇你想要進行螢幕擴充的裝置,並點擊「開始螢幕擴展」。系統會自動將你的平板延伸螢幕設定完成。

第三步:調整系統顯示器設定(選擇性)
若進行螢幕擴充後,你發現平板只是鏡像電腦螢幕上的內容,請前往作業系統的顯示器設定進行調整。
Windows 系統: 前往「設定」>>「系統」>>「顯示器」,將螢幕選項設定為「延伸這些顯示器」。你還可以根據你的使用習慣,透過拖拽修改兩塊螢幕的左右順序,打造最符合你需求的平板雙螢幕配置。

只需這簡單三個步驟,你就能成功將平板當外接螢幕使用,享受平板第二螢幕帶來的高效工作體驗!
如果你是 Mac 用戶且擁有 iPad,可以使用 Apple 內建的「並行」(Sidecar) 功能,這是蘋果系統自帶的 iPad 當外接螢幕解決方案。
Apple Sidecar 支援將 iPad 用作 Mac 電腦的外部平板延伸螢幕。使用方法簡單直覺,但需要注意以下限制條件:
連接要求:
兩台裝置已經登入同一個 Apple ID
兩台裝置都已經開啟藍牙、Wi-Fi 和「接力」功能
裝置距離不能超過 10 公尺
需要在同一網路環境下使用
蘋果並行功能適用範圍:
✅iPad作爲Mac的延伸螢幕
❌iPad作爲Windows的延伸螢幕
❌安卓平板作爲Mac的延伸螢幕
❌安卓平板作爲Windows的延伸螢幕
第一步:打開 Mac 系統設定,點選側邊欄的「顯示器」進入設定,點擊「+」號,選中你的 iPad。

第二步: 選中 iPad,選擇它做為「延伸的顯示器」,並檢查 Mac 頂部工具列的 AirPlay 設定,將 iPad 的選項設定為「作為單獨的顯示器使用」即可完成平板延伸螢幕設定。雖然蘋果並行功能設定簡單,但僅限於 Mac + iPad 的組合,若想要更靈活的跨平台平板外接螢幕解決方案,建議使用前面介紹的 DeskIn 遠端桌面軟體。

如果你使用的是三星平板,可以利用內建的「第二螢幕」功能,實現 Android 平板當外接螢幕的需求。三星平板電腦有內建的「第二螢幕」功能,可以與 Windows 電腦串聯起來。使用起來的畫質和流暢度都相當不錯,但此功能僅限於三星裝置,且不適用於蘋果裝置。
三星第二螢幕適用範圍:
❌iPad作爲Mac的延伸螢幕
❌iPad作爲Windows的延伸螢幕
❌三星平板作爲Mac的延伸螢幕
✅三星平板作爲Windows的延伸螢幕
第一步:從平板電腦螢幕頂部向下滑動,進入「快速設定面板」,滑動選單找到「第二螢幕」功能圖示,輕觸進入。

依照系統提示選擇連線模式「繪圖/遊戲」或「影片」,選好後,維持在「第二螢幕」頁面不要退出。

第二步:在電腦上按下快捷鍵「Windows + K」,在彈出的裝置清單中選中你要延伸的平板電腦即可。保持你的平板在「第二螢幕」頁面,平板電腦就會在裝置清單中出現,完成平板延伸螢幕連接。

為了幫助你選擇最適合的平板第二螢幕解決方案,以下整理三種方法的詳細比較表格:
對比項 | DeskIn | 蘋果Sidecar | 三星第二螢幕 |
iPad作爲Mac的延伸螢幕 | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
iPad作爲Windows的延伸螢幕 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Android 平板作為 Mac 的延伸螢幕 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Android 平板作為 Windows 的延伸螢幕 | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
畫質表現 | 4K60FPS | 依iPad而定 | HD 30~60FPS |
進階功能 | 遠端控制、檔案傳送、螢幕鏡像 | ❌ | ❌ |
網路要求 | 不限網路環境 | 需同一區域網路 | 需同一區域網路 |
跨平台支援 | 全平台支援 | 僅 Mac + iPad | 僅三星平板 + Windows |
設定難度 | 簡單 (3 步驟) | 簡單 (2 步驟) | 中等 (2 步驟) |

面對三種不同的平板外接螢幕方法,你可能會困惑該如何選擇。其實選擇的關鍵在於你的裝置組合和使用需求,以下整理各方案的最佳適用情境:
選擇 DeskIn 適合:
需要跨平台支援 (任何電腦配任何平板)
追求高畫質 4K 60FPS 體驗
不希望受限於同一網路環境和距離,即使人帶著筆電在咖啡廳,平板在家,也能延伸過去
需要額外的遠端控制和檔案傳輸功能
選擇蘋果 Sidecar 適合:
只使用 Mac + iPad 組合
重視蘋果生態系整合
網路環境穩定
選擇三星第二螢幕適合:
只使用三星平板 + Windows 電腦
習慣使用原廠內建功能
從功能性、相容性和使用彈性來看,DeskIn 無疑是最全面的平板外接螢幕解決方案,特別適合需要靈活運用不同裝置組合的使用者。
在評估各種平板延伸螢幕方案後,DeskIn 以其卓越的性能和全面的功能脫穎而出:
真正的跨平台自由:不同於蘋果 Sidecar 只支援 Mac + iPad,或三星第二螢幕僅限三星裝置,DeskIn 讓你自由組合任何電腦和平板。無論你想要 iPad 當外接螢幕連接 Windows,或 Android 平板當外接螢幕連接 Mac,DeskIn 都能完美支援。
專業級的顯示品質:支援 4K 60FPS 的高解析度輸出,讓你的平板外接螢幕擁有媲美專業顯示器的畫質表現。無論是設計工作、影片剪輯或遊戲娛樂,都能享受流暢清晰的視覺體驗。
突破網路限制:DeskIn 不需要在同一網路環境下使用,且不受距離限制,即使你在咖啡廳、圖書館或戶外工作,都能輕鬆連接平板雙螢幕,真正實現行動辦公的自由。
超值的附加功能:除了基本的平板延伸螢幕功能,DeskIn 還提供遠端控制、檔案傳輸、螢幕鏡像等進階功能,一個軟體滿足多種需求,性價比超高。
Q1:平板當第二螢幕會不會很耗電?
使用平板延伸螢幕功能確實會消耗平板電力,但現代平板的電池續航力都相當不錯。建議長時間使用時可以連接充電線,或選擇支援低功耗模式的軟體如 DeskIn,能有效延長使用時間。
Q2:平板外接螢幕的畫質會不會比較差?
完全取決於你選擇的方案和平板本身的螢幕規格。使用 DeskIn 這類支援 4K 60FPS 的專業軟體,搭配高解析度平板,平板第二螢幕的顯示效果甚至能媲美專業外接顯示器,完全不用擔心畫質問題。
Q3:Android 平板當外接螢幕需要 root 嗎?
不需要。無論是使用 DeskIn、三星第二螢幕或其他平板延伸螢幕方案,都不需要 root 你的 Android 平板。只需下載對應的應用程式並完成簡單設定即可使用。
Q4:使用平板雙螢幕會不會有延遲問題?
延遲程度取決於連接方式和網路狀況。DeskIn 採用優化的串流技術,即使不在同一網路環境下也能提供流暢的使用體驗。如果追求極低延遲,建議使用有線連接或確保良好的 Wi-Fi 環境。對於一般文書作業、網頁瀏覽等日常應用,延遲幾乎感覺不到。
本文詳細介紹了如何將手邊的 iPad 和 Android 平板變成電腦的平板第二螢幕,並分享了 6 個實用的平板雙螢幕工作技巧。無論是節省切換視窗時間、資料校對、影片剪輯,或是設計工作,平板延伸螢幕都能大幅提升你的工作效率。
我們也比較了三種免費的平板外接螢幕方法:DeskIn 遠端軟體、蘋果並行功能、三星第二螢幕。每種方法都有其特點,但若你追求最全面的跨平台支援、最高的顯示畫質、最靈活的使用場景,以及豐富的進階功能,DeskIn 遠端桌面絕對是你的最佳選擇。
現在就下載 DeskIn,體驗 iPad 當外接螢幕或 Android 平板當外接螢幕的便利,讓你的生產力立即翻倍!簡單三步驟,3 分鐘內完成設定,馬上享受高效的平板第二螢幕工作環境!

隨著遠端工作與居家辦公越來越受歡迎,雙螢幕需求大增。但你知道嗎?家裡閒置的 iPad 或 Android 平板,其實就是最好的平板第二螢幕解決方案!比起另外購買可攜式螢幕或外接顯示器,將平板當外接螢幕不僅省錢,還能充分利用現有設備。
無論是想實現 iPad 當外接螢幕提升 Mac 工作效率,或是讓 Android 平板當外接螢幕擴展 Windows 桌面,本文將完整解析 3 種免費的平板延伸螢幕方法,並分享 6 個實用的平板雙螢幕工作技巧,讓你的生產力立即翻倍!
在介紹具體方法前,先來了解為什麼平板外接螢幕能大幅提升工作效率。相較於傳統單螢幕作業,平板第二螢幕能為你帶來以下優勢:
桌面空間翻倍:透過平板延伸螢幕,顯示區域瞬間加倍,不再需要在多個視窗間頻繁切換
多工處理更順暢:一個螢幕看資料,另一個螢幕執行任務,工作流程更流暢
攜帶方便:比起笨重的外接螢幕,平板當外接螢幕輕便好攜帶,特別適合在咖啡廳或共享空間工作
成本效益高:不需要額外購買昂貴的可攜式螢幕,充分利用手邊的 iPad 或 Android 平板
畫質優異:現代平板螢幕解析度高,色彩表現好,作為第二螢幕毫不遜色
掌握正確的使用方法,才能真正發揮平板第二螢幕的威力。以下 6 個技巧,讓你的工作效率倍增:
多工處理最怕一直切換視窗。透過平板延伸螢幕,你可以把不同程式或資料檔案分別在兩個螢幕上開啟。例如主螢幕開啟 Word 檔案,平板外接螢幕顯示參考資料或網頁,畫面井然有序,不再手忙腳亂地找檔案。這種平板雙螢幕配置能大幅節省來回切換的時間,讓作業空間更加整潔有條理。對於需要同時監看多個系統或應用程式的工作者來說,這個功能簡直是救星!
在做文字或數據比對時,使用系統自帶的分割畫面功能常讓字變得太小、資料顯示不全,看得很吃力。利用平板當外接螢幕的方式,可以把兩個檔案各開在不同螢幕,字體維持正常大小、排版不亂,搭配修訂功能,更容易對照修改。
無論是 iPad 當外接螢幕比對 Excel 報表,或用三星平板當外接螢幕核對合約內容,這種設定都能讓校對工作更輕鬆準確。
剪影片時常需要邊找素材邊編輯?你可以將剪輯軟體 (如 Premiere Pro、Final Cut Pro) 放在主螢幕,平板第二螢幕開啟檔案管理器或素材資源庫,就能一鍵快速拖拉素材,減少反覆切換,大大提高剪輯效率。也可以將平板外接螢幕作為預覽區,主螢幕作為工作區,畫面更大細節看得更清晰。這種平板延伸螢幕的配置方式,讓專業創作者都讚不絕口。
要看長條型的影片、文檔或程式碼?把你的平板雙螢幕直立擺放,無論看直式影片或瀏覽長篇文字都更舒適、省下滑動的時間。這個技巧對於剪輯直屏短片、閱讀長篇論文或檢視程式碼特別實用。將 iPad 當外接螢幕並旋轉至直立模式,能完美展示一整頁 A4 文件或完整的程式碼片段,大幅提升閱讀體驗。
無論是寫論文、寫報告或編輯稿件,都少不了查資料。平板當第二螢幕能讓你左邊看原文資料、右邊對照翻譯文,一邊開著資料來源、一邊寫作,不用不斷來回切換視窗,還可以無縫將所需資訊進行複製、粘貼,提高效率。這種平板延伸螢幕的應用方式,特別適合學生撰寫論文、文字工作者整理稿件,或行銷人員製作企劃書,讓資料整合工作變得輕鬆許多。
在做繪圖、修圖或影片編輯時,平板當外接螢幕簡直是秘密武器!不論是放大細節檢視,或把 Photoshop、Illustrator 的特定工具面板移到另一台螢幕,都能讓工作空間更大更靈活。將 iPad 當外接螢幕顯示圖層面板和工具列,主螢幕專心創作,這種配置能讓設計師的創意發揮得淋漓盡致,用起來更順手。
想要一個跨平台、高畫質、設定簡單的平板第二螢幕方案嗎?DeskIn 是目前市場上最優質的選擇。這款免費的遠端桌面軟體,能夠輕鬆實現各種平板延伸螢幕需求。
DeskIn 是一款跨平台支援的專業遠端桌面軟體,能夠輕鬆串聯不同品牌、系統的裝置,提升裝置使用效率。它的免費延伸螢幕功能適用於所有操作系統之間任意延伸,具備以下特色:
全平台支援: 無論是 iPad 當外接螢幕連接 Mac/Windows,或 Android 平板當外接螢幕連接任何電腦,DeskIn 都能完美支援
超高畫質: 支援 4K 60FPS 高解析度,平板外接螢幕的顯示效果媲美專業顯示器
無感延遲體驗: 操作起來非常流暢,不會卡頓或延遲,特別適合需要即時互動的工作場景
無網路限制: 不需要在同一網路環境下,不受距離限制,隨時隨地都能使用平板延伸螢幕功能
簡單三步驟: 下載、登入、連接,3 分鐘內完成平板雙螢幕設定
除了基本的平板第二螢幕功能外,DeskIn 還提供強大的進階功能:
遠端控制: 用 iPad 或平板直接遠端控制你的電腦,外出也能處理緊急事務
檔案傳輸: 在電腦與移動裝置之間快速傳送檔案,ipad和電腦之間也可以傳檔,不需要透過雲端或傳輸線
螢幕鏡像: 將電腦畫面完整鏡像到平板外接螢幕上,適合簡報展示
遊戲串流: 甚至可以將電腦遊戲串流到平板上遊玩,還能在 iPad 上外接手把,或自訂 PC 遊戲按鈕組合,享受更流暢的操作體驗。
介面非常直覺,無需複雜設定,對於想要輕鬆實現 iPad 當外接螢幕或 Android 平板當外接螢幕的使用者來說,絕對是最佳選擇。
DeskIn 適用範圍:
✅ iPad 作為 Mac 的延伸螢幕
✅ iPad 作為 Windows 的延伸螢幕
✅ Android 平板作為 Mac 的延伸螢幕
✅ Android 平板作為 Windows 的延伸螢幕
想要透過 DeskIn 將平板當外接螢幕嗎?以下提供完整的操作教學,讓你輕鬆完成平板第二螢幕設定。
第一步:下載並註冊 DeskIn 帳號
首先在你的電腦和平板上下載 DeskIn 應用程式,然後註冊一個免費帳戶並分別登入。這個步驟非常簡單,無論你是要設定 iPad 當外接螢幕或 Android 平板當外接螢幕都一樣。

注意: 如果你是首次在新裝置登入,需要到註冊信箱完成驗證,這是為了保障帳戶安全。

第二步:啟動平板延伸螢幕功能
在電腦端 DeskIn 上點擊左邊選單「鏡像屏/擴展屏」,點擊「立刻進行螢幕擴展」選擇你想要進行螢幕擴充的裝置,並點擊「開始螢幕擴展」。系統會自動將你的平板延伸螢幕設定完成。

第三步:調整系統顯示器設定(選擇性)
若進行螢幕擴充後,你發現平板只是鏡像電腦螢幕上的內容,請前往作業系統的顯示器設定進行調整。
Windows 系統: 前往「設定」>>「系統」>>「顯示器」,將螢幕選項設定為「延伸這些顯示器」。你還可以根據你的使用習慣,透過拖拽修改兩塊螢幕的左右順序,打造最符合你需求的平板雙螢幕配置。

只需這簡單三個步驟,你就能成功將平板當外接螢幕使用,享受平板第二螢幕帶來的高效工作體驗!
如果你是 Mac 用戶且擁有 iPad,可以使用 Apple 內建的「並行」(Sidecar) 功能,這是蘋果系統自帶的 iPad 當外接螢幕解決方案。
Apple Sidecar 支援將 iPad 用作 Mac 電腦的外部平板延伸螢幕。使用方法簡單直覺,但需要注意以下限制條件:
連接要求:
兩台裝置已經登入同一個 Apple ID
兩台裝置都已經開啟藍牙、Wi-Fi 和「接力」功能
裝置距離不能超過 10 公尺
需要在同一網路環境下使用
蘋果並行功能適用範圍:
✅iPad作爲Mac的延伸螢幕
❌iPad作爲Windows的延伸螢幕
❌安卓平板作爲Mac的延伸螢幕
❌安卓平板作爲Windows的延伸螢幕
第一步:打開 Mac 系統設定,點選側邊欄的「顯示器」進入設定,點擊「+」號,選中你的 iPad。

第二步: 選中 iPad,選擇它做為「延伸的顯示器」,並檢查 Mac 頂部工具列的 AirPlay 設定,將 iPad 的選項設定為「作為單獨的顯示器使用」即可完成平板延伸螢幕設定。雖然蘋果並行功能設定簡單,但僅限於 Mac + iPad 的組合,若想要更靈活的跨平台平板外接螢幕解決方案,建議使用前面介紹的 DeskIn 遠端桌面軟體。

如果你使用的是三星平板,可以利用內建的「第二螢幕」功能,實現 Android 平板當外接螢幕的需求。三星平板電腦有內建的「第二螢幕」功能,可以與 Windows 電腦串聯起來。使用起來的畫質和流暢度都相當不錯,但此功能僅限於三星裝置,且不適用於蘋果裝置。
三星第二螢幕適用範圍:
❌iPad作爲Mac的延伸螢幕
❌iPad作爲Windows的延伸螢幕
❌三星平板作爲Mac的延伸螢幕
✅三星平板作爲Windows的延伸螢幕
第一步:從平板電腦螢幕頂部向下滑動,進入「快速設定面板」,滑動選單找到「第二螢幕」功能圖示,輕觸進入。

依照系統提示選擇連線模式「繪圖/遊戲」或「影片」,選好後,維持在「第二螢幕」頁面不要退出。

第二步:在電腦上按下快捷鍵「Windows + K」,在彈出的裝置清單中選中你要延伸的平板電腦即可。保持你的平板在「第二螢幕」頁面,平板電腦就會在裝置清單中出現,完成平板延伸螢幕連接。

為了幫助你選擇最適合的平板第二螢幕解決方案,以下整理三種方法的詳細比較表格:
對比項 | DeskIn | 蘋果Sidecar | 三星第二螢幕 |
iPad作爲Mac的延伸螢幕 | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
iPad作爲Windows的延伸螢幕 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Android 平板作為 Mac 的延伸螢幕 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Android 平板作為 Windows 的延伸螢幕 | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
畫質表現 | 4K60FPS | 依iPad而定 | HD 30~60FPS |
進階功能 | 遠端控制、檔案傳送、螢幕鏡像 | ❌ | ❌ |
網路要求 | 不限網路環境 | 需同一區域網路 | 需同一區域網路 |
跨平台支援 | 全平台支援 | 僅 Mac + iPad | 僅三星平板 + Windows |
設定難度 | 簡單 (3 步驟) | 簡單 (2 步驟) | 中等 (2 步驟) |

面對三種不同的平板外接螢幕方法,你可能會困惑該如何選擇。其實選擇的關鍵在於你的裝置組合和使用需求,以下整理各方案的最佳適用情境:
選擇 DeskIn 適合:
需要跨平台支援 (任何電腦配任何平板)
追求高畫質 4K 60FPS 體驗
不希望受限於同一網路環境和距離,即使人帶著筆電在咖啡廳,平板在家,也能延伸過去
需要額外的遠端控制和檔案傳輸功能
選擇蘋果 Sidecar 適合:
只使用 Mac + iPad 組合
重視蘋果生態系整合
網路環境穩定
選擇三星第二螢幕適合:
只使用三星平板 + Windows 電腦
習慣使用原廠內建功能
從功能性、相容性和使用彈性來看,DeskIn 無疑是最全面的平板外接螢幕解決方案,特別適合需要靈活運用不同裝置組合的使用者。
在評估各種平板延伸螢幕方案後,DeskIn 以其卓越的性能和全面的功能脫穎而出:
真正的跨平台自由:不同於蘋果 Sidecar 只支援 Mac + iPad,或三星第二螢幕僅限三星裝置,DeskIn 讓你自由組合任何電腦和平板。無論你想要 iPad 當外接螢幕連接 Windows,或 Android 平板當外接螢幕連接 Mac,DeskIn 都能完美支援。
專業級的顯示品質:支援 4K 60FPS 的高解析度輸出,讓你的平板外接螢幕擁有媲美專業顯示器的畫質表現。無論是設計工作、影片剪輯或遊戲娛樂,都能享受流暢清晰的視覺體驗。
突破網路限制:DeskIn 不需要在同一網路環境下使用,且不受距離限制,即使你在咖啡廳、圖書館或戶外工作,都能輕鬆連接平板雙螢幕,真正實現行動辦公的自由。
超值的附加功能:除了基本的平板延伸螢幕功能,DeskIn 還提供遠端控制、檔案傳輸、螢幕鏡像等進階功能,一個軟體滿足多種需求,性價比超高。
Q1:平板當第二螢幕會不會很耗電?
使用平板延伸螢幕功能確實會消耗平板電力,但現代平板的電池續航力都相當不錯。建議長時間使用時可以連接充電線,或選擇支援低功耗模式的軟體如 DeskIn,能有效延長使用時間。
Q2:平板外接螢幕的畫質會不會比較差?
完全取決於你選擇的方案和平板本身的螢幕規格。使用 DeskIn 這類支援 4K 60FPS 的專業軟體,搭配高解析度平板,平板第二螢幕的顯示效果甚至能媲美專業外接顯示器,完全不用擔心畫質問題。
Q3:Android 平板當外接螢幕需要 root 嗎?
不需要。無論是使用 DeskIn、三星第二螢幕或其他平板延伸螢幕方案,都不需要 root 你的 Android 平板。只需下載對應的應用程式並完成簡單設定即可使用。
Q4:使用平板雙螢幕會不會有延遲問題?
延遲程度取決於連接方式和網路狀況。DeskIn 採用優化的串流技術,即使不在同一網路環境下也能提供流暢的使用體驗。如果追求極低延遲,建議使用有線連接或確保良好的 Wi-Fi 環境。對於一般文書作業、網頁瀏覽等日常應用,延遲幾乎感覺不到。
本文詳細介紹了如何將手邊的 iPad 和 Android 平板變成電腦的平板第二螢幕,並分享了 6 個實用的平板雙螢幕工作技巧。無論是節省切換視窗時間、資料校對、影片剪輯,或是設計工作,平板延伸螢幕都能大幅提升你的工作效率。
我們也比較了三種免費的平板外接螢幕方法:DeskIn 遠端軟體、蘋果並行功能、三星第二螢幕。每種方法都有其特點,但若你追求最全面的跨平台支援、最高的顯示畫質、最靈活的使用場景,以及豐富的進階功能,DeskIn 遠端桌面絕對是你的最佳選擇。
現在就下載 DeskIn,體驗 iPad 當外接螢幕或 Android 平板當外接螢幕的便利,讓你的生產力立即翻倍!簡單三步驟,3 分鐘內完成設定,馬上享受高效的平板第二螢幕工作環境!


Control Windows from Your Mac with Chrome Remote Desktop: Setup Guide & Pitfalls | DeskIn Japan
For Mac users working in Japan, there's a recurring frustration: a piece of software you need exists only on Windows. Whether it's CAD tools, Japanese accounting software (kaikei sofuto, 会計ソフト) required by your company, Windows-exclusive business systems, or PC games — the need to run Windows doesn't go away just because you prefer Mac.
The good news is you don't need to buy a separate Windows machine. Google's free tool Chrome Remote Desktop lets you control a Windows PC remotely from your Mac, and the setup is simpler than most people expect.
This guide walks through the fastest path to getting connected, and then covers the cross-platform quirks that tend to catch Mac users off guard once they're actually in a session.
Chrome Remote Desktop's configuration is straightforward, but it requires preparation on both machines — the Windows PC being controlled (the host) and the Mac doing the controlling (the client). Here's the fastest path to a working connection.
Start by allowing remote access on the Windows machine.
Install the extension and host software
Open Chrome and go to the Chrome Remote Desktop access page. Under "Set up remote access," click the blue download icon. Follow the prompts to add the Chrome extension and run the installer (.msi file).

Name your PC and set a PIN
After installation, give the PC a name you'll recognise. Then set a PIN of at least six digits — you'll need to enter this every time you connect from your Mac, so write it somewhere safe.

3. Important: Disable Sleep Mode
This is the step most people miss, and it will prevent connections entirely if skipped. A Windows PC in sleep mode cannot be reached remotely.
Go to Settings → System → Power & Battery
Under "Screen and Sleep," set "Put device to sleep after" to Never when plugged in

Once the Windows side is configured, connecting from your Mac is simple.
Log in to the access site
Open Chrome on your Mac and navigate to the same Chrome Remote Desktop access page. Make sure you're logged into the same Google account you used when setting up the Windows PC.

Select your PC and authenticate
Your Windows PC will appear under "Remote devices." Click it and enter your PIN — the Windows desktop will open inside your Chrome browser.

3. Connection complete
You can now control Windows using your Mac's keyboard and mouse.
Tip: For quicker access in the future, use Chrome's "Install as app" option to add Chrome Remote Desktop to your Mac's Dock — saves a few clicks every time.
H2: Cross-Platform Pitfalls: What Mac Users Run Into
Chrome Remote Desktop is easy to set up, but once you're inside a session, the Mac–Windows gap creates friction points that directly affect how much work you can actually get done. These are worth understanding before you depend on CRD for anything important.
H3: Keyboard Mapping Conflicts
The biggest source of frustration for Mac users is the modifier key difference.
Command key vs Control key: On Mac, you copy with Command + C. On Windows, it's Control + C.. In a remote session, Mac's Command key is sometimes interpreted as the Windows key rather than Control — meaning the shortcuts your hands have memorised simply don't work as expected.
The Command + Q problem: This one catches people regularly. If you're working in a Windows application and instinctively press Command + Q to close it, you don't close the Windows app — you close Chrome on your Mac, ending the remote session entirely. It happens more than once before you break the habit.

This is a significant operational limitation, and worth understanding before you depend on CRD for regular remote access.
Wake on LAN (WoL) not supported: Chrome Remote Desktop cannot remotely power on or wake up a PC that is off or sleeping. To maintain reliable remote access, the Windows PC must be left powered on continuously.
Always-on requirement: For people living in Japan, where electricity costs are relatively high and there's a cultural awareness around energy waste (mottainai, もったいない — the Japanese concept of waste-aversion that runs through everyday life), leaving a PC running overnight when it doesn't need to be is a friction point both practically and psychologically.
No more struggling with key input or power management. Stop here and try DeskIn — built for Mac users. [Install DeskIn for free]
The smooth, precise feel that makes Mac trackpads enjoyable doesn't carry through to a remote Windows session cleanly.
Lost gestures: Mac-specific gestures — three-finger swipes to switch desktops, pinch-to-zoom — don't transmit to Windows correctly and either do nothing or trigger the wrong action.
Unnatural scrolling: Mac's inertial scrolling feels choppy in the remote environment. Right-click response has a slight lag. These are small things individually, but they add up over a full work session.
As a browser-based tool, Chrome Remote Desktop is constrained by what it can push through a browser window.
Frame rate cap: Chrome Remote Desktop typically runs at around 30FPS. For standard document editing this is fine, but anything with fast on-screen movement shows obvious lag and ghosting.
Not suited for demanding tasks: Video editing, FPS games, or any application requiring sub-second responsiveness — the latency is too significant to be practical.
Based on everything above, here's an honest assessment of where CRD works well and where it doesn't. Use this as a checklist before you decide.
✓ Recommended — CRD is a good fit for:
Quick file checks: Accessing a document on your home PC from the office or a café
Occasional admin tasks: Restarting a server, running a quick software update
Light office work: Simple browser-based data entry, sending emails — tasks where speed isn't critical
Zero-cost access: When "free and connected" is the overriding priority over performance
✗ Not recommended — CRD is a poor fit for:
Daily remote work: Working remotely for several hours at a stretch. Keyboard friction and choppy performance become a real source of stress.
Creative work: Video editing, graphic design, CAD. Accurate mouse movement, colour fidelity, and smooth rendering are all compromised.
Latency-sensitive tasks (gaming etc.): Any application where split-second responsiveness matters.
Professionals who need native performance: Not "can I connect" — but "does it feel like my own machine?"
In short: Chrome Remote Desktop is best treated as an emergency backup tool, not a primary workflow. If any of the "not recommended" scenarios describe your situation, a more capable tool is worth exploring.
There's a gap between "it connects" and "it feels like my own machine." If you've spent time with Chrome Remote Desktop and found yourself in that gap — frustrated by keyboard confusion, the always-on power requirement, or choppy performance — DeskIn is the purpose-built solution for exactly those problems.
One of DeskIn's standout features is its intelligent key mapping that bridges the OS divide automatically.
The Command/Control confusion that CRD leaves unresolved — and the "Command + Q closes Chrome" problem that ends remote sessions unexpectedly — are both solved. Your Mac keyboard layout works as expected in Windows, without workarounds. You can type at full speed without stopping to think about which key does what.
"I want to connect from outside, but I don't want to leave my PC running all day..." — DeskIn solves this.
With Wake on LAN (WoL) support, you can remotely power on a Windows PC from your Mac — even if it's shut down or sleeping. Start it when you need it, work, then let it sleep again. Less electricity, less wear on hardware, and a smarter way to work.
DeskIn streams at 4K resolution and up to 60FPS — far beyond what CRD's browser-based approach can achieve.
Whether you're doing fine-detail design work, editing video, or playing a game, the response feels close to native. The lag that makes CRD frustrating for demanding tasks effectively disappears.

DeskIn's performance advantage extends beyond Mac to mobile — connecting from an iPad or smartphone delivers the same quality experience.
Use your iPad as an extended display for Windows, or connect a mouse and keyboard for a complete remote work setup. Gesture support is optimised for touch in a way that CRD's mobile app isn't. If you move between Mac and iPad regularly, DeskIn handles both well.
Feature | Chrome Remote Desktop | DeskIn |
Primary use case | Occasional access / emergency use | Business, creative work, gaming |
Display quality | Up to 30FPS (choppy) | 4K / 60–144FPS (extremely smooth) |
Keyboard mapping | Basic — Command/Ctrl conflicts | Auto-optimised for Mac/Windows (no conflicts) |
Wake on LAN | Not supported — PC must stay on | Supported — start PC remotely |
Input feel | Noticeable lag, gesture loss | Low latency, Mac-native feel |
Cost | Free | Free tier available / Pro version |
Chrome Remote Desktop earns its place as an entry-level tool. Its ease of use and zero cost make it a great starting point for quick file access, occasional light tasks, and situations where budget is the overriding factor.
But if you're using a remote desktop regularly — for work, creative projects, or gaming — the accumulated frustrations of keyboard conflicts, always-on power requirements, and performance caps start to outweigh the convenience of free.
When that point arrives, DeskIn is the obvious next step: a tool designed from the ground up for people who need remote access to actually feel like working locally. Whether you're at your apartment, in a café in Kichioji, or somewhere further afield — your Windows machine should feel like it's right in front of you.
Experience professional-grade performance now — [Download DeskIn free and try it]

DeskIn vs Chrome Remote Desktop: Which One Fits Your Workflow Best?
When it comes to remote access tools, the comparison between DeskIn and Chrome Remote Desktop often comes down to one simple question: do you just need quick access, or do you need performance and control?
Both tools are reliable, secure, and widely used. But they are built for very different types of users. Chrome Remote Desktop focuses on simplicity and accessibility, while DeskIn is designed for users who need high performance, stability, and advanced features across multiple devices.
If you're deciding between the two, this guide breaks down not just what they offer, but which one actually fits your workflow.
Feature | DeskIn | Chrome Remote Desktop |
|---|---|---|
Performance | Up to 4K 60FPS/2K 240FPS, low latency | Standard performance |
Ease of Use | Requires app installation | Browser-based, very simple |
Device Support | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Works via Chrome browser |
File Transfer | Fast and stable | Limited |
Multi-device Management | Yes | No |
Mobile Experience | Optimized for iPad & iPhone | Basic |
Security | Privacy screens and granular black/whitelists | Basic |
Price | Free + paid plans | Completely free |
In short, Chrome Remote Desktop is great for quick, lightweight access, while DeskIn is built for users who expect more from their remote desktop experience.


Chrome Remote Desktop is one of the simplest remote access tools available. It runs directly through the Chrome browser and requires only a Google account to get started. This makes it especially popular among casual users and those already working within the Google ecosystem.
It works particularly well on devices like Chromebooks, where everything is already browser-based. It's also accessible across platforms, including mobile devices like iPhone and iPad, though the experience on mobile can feel limited compared to desktop use.
If you're wondering how to use Chrome Remote Desktop, the process is straightforward. You install the Chrome extension, sign in with your Google account, set up a PIN on the host device, and then connect from another device using the same account. The entire setup usually takes just a few minutes.
That said, simplicity comes with trade-offs. Chrome Remote Desktop lacks advanced features like high frame rate streaming, multi-monitor control, or professional-grade file transfer. For occasional access, it works well. But for more demanding tasks, users often start to feel its limitations.
👀You may also be interested in:

If Chrome Remote Desktop is a lightweight sketch, DeskIn is a full workstation painted in high resolution. DeskIn focuses on performance, stability, and flexibility. It supports up to 4K 60FPS streaming, making it suitable for tasks where visual clarity and responsiveness matter, such as design work, video editing, or even gaming.
As a Chrome remote desktop alternative, unlike browser-based tools, DeskIn is a dedicated remote desktop application. While this requires installation, it unlocks a much more stable and feature-rich experience. Users can manage multiple devices, transfer large files efficiently, and enjoy smoother control across different platforms.
DeskIn is also optimized for mobile workflows. Whether you're using an iPad or smartphone, the interaction feels more responsive and closer to a desktop experience, rather than a simplified viewer. For users who find Chrome Remote Desktop "good enough" at first but limiting over time, DeskIn often becomes the natural upgrade path.
The real difference between these two tools becomes clear when you look at how they perform in everyday scenarios.
If you only need to check files on your home computer or help a friend troubleshoot something quickly, Chrome Remote Desktop is more than enough. It's free, easy to set up, and doesn't require installing extra software beyond Chrome. In this case, DeskIn may feel like overkill.
For professionals working remotely on a daily basis, stability and efficiency matter much more. This is where DeskIn starts to stand out.
Tasks like editing documents, managing multiple screens, or transferring files between devices become smoother and faster. Chrome Remote Desktop can handle basic workflows, but it often struggles with responsiveness and lacks the tools needed for a seamless work environment.
This is where the gap becomes impossible to ignore. DeskIn's support for high resolution and high frame rates makes it suitable for visually demanding work. Whether you're editing videos, working with design software, or running simulations, performance consistency is critical. Chrome Remote Desktop, on the other hand, is not designed for these scenarios. It works, but not comfortably.
If you rely heavily on Google services or use a Chromebook, Chrome Remote Desktop integrates naturally into your workflow. It's lightweight, requires no additional setup, and feels like an extension of the browser itself. In this scenario, it remains a very practical choice.
Mobile usage highlights another important difference. While remote desktop Chrome iPhone, and Chrome Remote Desktop iPad are functional, they often feel like simplified versions of the desktop experience. Controls can be less intuitive, and performance may vary depending on the connection.
DeskIn, by contrast, is designed with cross-device interaction in mind, offering a smoother and more responsive mobile experience.
👀 You may also be interested in:
Yes. Tools like DeskIn offer better performance, more features, and improved stability, especially for professional use cases.
No, Chrome Remote Desktop is still actively maintained by Google. It continues to receive security updates and remains available for users needing simple, free remote access.
Yes, DeskIn is a legitimate remote desktop solution. It uses encryption to secure connections and provides access controls, making it safe for both personal and professional use.
When comparing DeskIn vs Chrome Remote Desktop, the choice depends on how demanding your remote access needs are. Chrome Remote Desktop is simple, free, and ideal for occasional use, especially if you just need quick access to a device without extra setup.
As your workflow becomes more intensive, the limitations start to surface. DeskIn offers a smoother, more stable experience with better performance and control, making it a strong long-term Chrome remote desktop alternative for users who rely on remote access every day.


8 Best Remote Desktops for Video Editing in 2026
Remote video editing is no longer a compromise; it's a workflow upgrade. Whether you're working in Adobe Premiere Pro, After Effects, or DaVinci Resolve, the right remote desktop can turn your laptop into a high-performance editing station.
But not all tools are built for remote video editing collaboration. Lag, poor color accuracy, and unstable connections can ruin productivity. In this guide, we'll break down the best remote desktop for video editing tools so that you can edit smoothly from anywhere.
Modern creators are no longer tied to a single workstation. With remote work software, you can access your powerful desktop from anywhere without investing in an expensive laptop. For many editors, especially freelancers and small teams, this solves a real problem: you already have a high-performance PC, but mobility is limited. Instead of duplicating hardware, video editing remote desktop tools let you stream your workflow in real time.
Another key benefit is remote collaboration. Teams can work on the same project across different locations, review edits instantly, and avoid large file transfers via remote collaboration tools. However, this only works if your remote desktop software supports high frame rates, low latency, and stable connections. Otherwise, editing becomes frustrating.

Here's a quick overview of the best tools and who they're for:
DeskIn – Best overall for performance + affordability + multi-device workflows
Parsec – Best for ultra-low latency editing
Splashtop – Best for high-resolution streaming
HP Anyware – Best for enterprise-level workflows
Jump Desktop – Best for Mac users
AnyDesk – Best lightweight remote access
Chrome Remote Desktop – Best free basic option
RustDesk – Best open-source alternative
Up to 4K 60FPS / 2K 240FPS performance
Ultra-low latency for smooth editing timelines
Multi-device support (PC, Mac, iPad, Android)
Affordable pricing with free plan available
Smaller brand awareness compared to legacy tools

DeskIn stands out as the best remote desktop for video editing by balancing performance, stability, and accessibility. Unlike many traditional remote support tools, it is designed for high-frame-rate tasks, making timeline scrubbing, preview playback, and effects editing feel responsive and fluid.
For creators working across devices, DeskIn enables seamless remote video editing collaboration. You can access your main editing PC from a laptop, tablet, or even a secondary workstation without noticeable lag. Compared to tools like Chrome Remote Desktop, which struggle with video-heavy workloads, DeskIn maintains consistent quality and responsiveness—making it a practical choice for both solo editors and distributed teams.

Extremely low latency
High frame rate streaming
Popular among creative professionals
Limited collaboration features
Setup can be complex for beginners

Parsec is widely recognized as a top choice for remote video editing, especially when latency is your biggest concern. Its streaming technology is optimized for real-time responsiveness, which makes it ideal for tasks like timeline scrubbing and motion graphics work in After Effects.
However, while Parsec excels in performance, it lacks some features needed for full remote video editing collaboration. Multi-user workflows and advanced access control are not as robust as some newer tools. For users who need both performance and flexibility, alternatives like DeskIn may provide a more balanced solution.
Supports 4K streaming
Strong color accuracy
Reliable for creative tasks
Higher cost for advanced features
Can experience latency over long distances

Splashtop is a solid option for editors who prioritize visual fidelity. Its support for high-resolution streaming and 4:4:4 color makes it suitable for color grading and detailed editing work.
That said, performance consistency can vary depending on network conditions. Some users report lag when working outside local networks. Compared to more optimized remote work software like DeskIn, Splashtop may require a stronger connection to maintain the same level of smoothness.
Industry-grade performance
Secure and scalable
Used in professional studios
Expensive
Complex setup

HP Anyware (formerly Teradici) is designed for high-end production environments. It uses advanced protocols to deliver excellent performance and security, making it a common choice in the media and entertainment industries.
However, for small teams or individual creators, it may be overkill. The cost and setup complexity make it less accessible compared to modern remote desktops for video editing tools that offer similar performance with easier deployment. The high cost and technical complexity create barriers that modern remote desktop solutions have eliminated, like DeskIn, offering comparable performance with far simpler deployment.
Great macOS integration
Smooth performance
Easy to use
Limited advanced features
Not ideal for heavy collaboration

Jump Desktop has earned a loyal following among Mac users seeking a straightforward, efficient remote desktop for video editing. Its Fluid Remote Desktop protocol provides smooth, responsive performance for most editing tasks without unnecessary complexity.
Where it falls short is in collaboration. Jump Desktop is built for individual use, lacking the team-oriented features that creative groups need. For solo professionals, it works well, but teams will quickly miss real-time collaboration tools found on other platforms.
Pros
Fast and lightweight
Easy to set up
Works on multiple devices
Cons
Limited performance for video editing
Lower visual quality

AnyDesk has built its reputation on lightweight design and remarkable ease of use for general remote access. It handles everyday tasks competently, connecting quickly and running smoothly on modest hardware.
The limitations become apparent with demanding creative work. Remote video editing requires consistent frame rates and crystal-clear visuals—areas where AnyDesk struggles. For professional editors who need precision, the performance gap becomes impossible to ignore.
Completely free
Easy browser-based setup
Works on any device
Poor performance for editing
Limited features

Chrome Remote Desktop is one of the most accessible remote support tools, offering a simple way to access your computer from anywhere. It's free, requires almost no setup, and lets you access your computer from anywhere with just a browser. For basic technical support or quick file grabs, it gets the job done.
However, it is not built for remote video editing. Users often experience lag, compression artifacts, and low frame rates. If you're working on professional projects, upgrading to a more capable solution is highly recommended.
Open-source
Self-hosting available
Free to use
Requires technical setup
Performance can vary

RustDesk appeals to users who prioritize open-source philosophy and want complete control over their remote access infrastructure. The flexibility to self-host and customize is genuinely valuable for privacy-conscious users. RustDesk is an interesting option for users who prefer open-source remote desktop not working alternatives or want full control over their infrastructure.
Performance, however, depends entirely on your configuration skills. Without technical expertise, achieving the smooth, low-latency experience required for professional editing is challenging. It's powerful for those who know how to tune it, but not plug-and-play.
Yes, with the right remote desktop for video editing, you can edit videos smoothly from anywhere. Tools like DeskIn and Parsec provide low latency and high frame rates for professional workflows.
Free options like Chrome Remote Desktop exist, but they lack performance. DeskIn offers a free plan with better performance, making it a stronger choice for real editing work.
Yes, Parsec is excellent for low-latency editing. However, it may lack collaboration features needed for team workflows.
Common issues include poor network connection, low bandwidth, or software limitations. Choosing optimized remote work software like DeskIn can significantly improve performance.
Choosing the best remote desktop for video editing depends on your workflow, budget, and performance needs. While tools like Parsec and Splashtop excel in specific areas, many solutions struggle to balance performance, stability, and usability.
If you're looking for a well-rounded solution, DeskIn offers a strong combination of high performance, smooth streaming, and cross-device flexibility. Whether you're working solo or collaborating remotely, it provides a reliable foundation for modern remote video editing workflows.


Control Windows from Your Mac with Chrome Remote Desktop: Setup Guide & Pitfalls | DeskIn Japan
For Mac users working in Japan, there's a recurring frustration: a piece of software you need exists only on Windows. Whether it's CAD tools, Japanese accounting software (kaikei sofuto, 会計ソフト) required by your company, Windows-exclusive business systems, or PC games — the need to run Windows doesn't go away just because you prefer Mac.
The good news is you don't need to buy a separate Windows machine. Google's free tool Chrome Remote Desktop lets you control a Windows PC remotely from your Mac, and the setup is simpler than most people expect.
This guide walks through the fastest path to getting connected, and then covers the cross-platform quirks that tend to catch Mac users off guard once they're actually in a session.
Chrome Remote Desktop's configuration is straightforward, but it requires preparation on both machines — the Windows PC being controlled (the host) and the Mac doing the controlling (the client). Here's the fastest path to a working connection.
Start by allowing remote access on the Windows machine.
Install the extension and host software
Open Chrome and go to the Chrome Remote Desktop access page. Under "Set up remote access," click the blue download icon. Follow the prompts to add the Chrome extension and run the installer (.msi file).

Name your PC and set a PIN
After installation, give the PC a name you'll recognise. Then set a PIN of at least six digits — you'll need to enter this every time you connect from your Mac, so write it somewhere safe.

3. Important: Disable Sleep Mode
This is the step most people miss, and it will prevent connections entirely if skipped. A Windows PC in sleep mode cannot be reached remotely.
Go to Settings → System → Power & Battery
Under "Screen and Sleep," set "Put device to sleep after" to Never when plugged in

Once the Windows side is configured, connecting from your Mac is simple.
Log in to the access site
Open Chrome on your Mac and navigate to the same Chrome Remote Desktop access page. Make sure you're logged into the same Google account you used when setting up the Windows PC.

Select your PC and authenticate
Your Windows PC will appear under "Remote devices." Click it and enter your PIN — the Windows desktop will open inside your Chrome browser.

3. Connection complete
You can now control Windows using your Mac's keyboard and mouse.
Tip: For quicker access in the future, use Chrome's "Install as app" option to add Chrome Remote Desktop to your Mac's Dock — saves a few clicks every time.
H2: Cross-Platform Pitfalls: What Mac Users Run Into
Chrome Remote Desktop is easy to set up, but once you're inside a session, the Mac–Windows gap creates friction points that directly affect how much work you can actually get done. These are worth understanding before you depend on CRD for anything important.
H3: Keyboard Mapping Conflicts
The biggest source of frustration for Mac users is the modifier key difference.
Command key vs Control key: On Mac, you copy with Command + C. On Windows, it's Control + C.. In a remote session, Mac's Command key is sometimes interpreted as the Windows key rather than Control — meaning the shortcuts your hands have memorised simply don't work as expected.
The Command + Q problem: This one catches people regularly. If you're working in a Windows application and instinctively press Command + Q to close it, you don't close the Windows app — you close Chrome on your Mac, ending the remote session entirely. It happens more than once before you break the habit.

This is a significant operational limitation, and worth understanding before you depend on CRD for regular remote access.
Wake on LAN (WoL) not supported: Chrome Remote Desktop cannot remotely power on or wake up a PC that is off or sleeping. To maintain reliable remote access, the Windows PC must be left powered on continuously.
Always-on requirement: For people living in Japan, where electricity costs are relatively high and there's a cultural awareness around energy waste (mottainai, もったいない — the Japanese concept of waste-aversion that runs through everyday life), leaving a PC running overnight when it doesn't need to be is a friction point both practically and psychologically.
No more struggling with key input or power management. Stop here and try DeskIn — built for Mac users. [Install DeskIn for free]
The smooth, precise feel that makes Mac trackpads enjoyable doesn't carry through to a remote Windows session cleanly.
Lost gestures: Mac-specific gestures — three-finger swipes to switch desktops, pinch-to-zoom — don't transmit to Windows correctly and either do nothing or trigger the wrong action.
Unnatural scrolling: Mac's inertial scrolling feels choppy in the remote environment. Right-click response has a slight lag. These are small things individually, but they add up over a full work session.
As a browser-based tool, Chrome Remote Desktop is constrained by what it can push through a browser window.
Frame rate cap: Chrome Remote Desktop typically runs at around 30FPS. For standard document editing this is fine, but anything with fast on-screen movement shows obvious lag and ghosting.
Not suited for demanding tasks: Video editing, FPS games, or any application requiring sub-second responsiveness — the latency is too significant to be practical.
Based on everything above, here's an honest assessment of where CRD works well and where it doesn't. Use this as a checklist before you decide.
✓ Recommended — CRD is a good fit for:
Quick file checks: Accessing a document on your home PC from the office or a café
Occasional admin tasks: Restarting a server, running a quick software update
Light office work: Simple browser-based data entry, sending emails — tasks where speed isn't critical
Zero-cost access: When "free and connected" is the overriding priority over performance
✗ Not recommended — CRD is a poor fit for:
Daily remote work: Working remotely for several hours at a stretch. Keyboard friction and choppy performance become a real source of stress.
Creative work: Video editing, graphic design, CAD. Accurate mouse movement, colour fidelity, and smooth rendering are all compromised.
Latency-sensitive tasks (gaming etc.): Any application where split-second responsiveness matters.
Professionals who need native performance: Not "can I connect" — but "does it feel like my own machine?"
In short: Chrome Remote Desktop is best treated as an emergency backup tool, not a primary workflow. If any of the "not recommended" scenarios describe your situation, a more capable tool is worth exploring.
There's a gap between "it connects" and "it feels like my own machine." If you've spent time with Chrome Remote Desktop and found yourself in that gap — frustrated by keyboard confusion, the always-on power requirement, or choppy performance — DeskIn is the purpose-built solution for exactly those problems.
One of DeskIn's standout features is its intelligent key mapping that bridges the OS divide automatically.
The Command/Control confusion that CRD leaves unresolved — and the "Command + Q closes Chrome" problem that ends remote sessions unexpectedly — are both solved. Your Mac keyboard layout works as expected in Windows, without workarounds. You can type at full speed without stopping to think about which key does what.
"I want to connect from outside, but I don't want to leave my PC running all day..." — DeskIn solves this.
With Wake on LAN (WoL) support, you can remotely power on a Windows PC from your Mac — even if it's shut down or sleeping. Start it when you need it, work, then let it sleep again. Less electricity, less wear on hardware, and a smarter way to work.
DeskIn streams at 4K resolution and up to 60FPS — far beyond what CRD's browser-based approach can achieve.
Whether you're doing fine-detail design work, editing video, or playing a game, the response feels close to native. The lag that makes CRD frustrating for demanding tasks effectively disappears.

DeskIn's performance advantage extends beyond Mac to mobile — connecting from an iPad or smartphone delivers the same quality experience.
Use your iPad as an extended display for Windows, or connect a mouse and keyboard for a complete remote work setup. Gesture support is optimised for touch in a way that CRD's mobile app isn't. If you move between Mac and iPad regularly, DeskIn handles both well.
Feature | Chrome Remote Desktop | DeskIn |
Primary use case | Occasional access / emergency use | Business, creative work, gaming |
Display quality | Up to 30FPS (choppy) | 4K / 60–144FPS (extremely smooth) |
Keyboard mapping | Basic — Command/Ctrl conflicts | Auto-optimised for Mac/Windows (no conflicts) |
Wake on LAN | Not supported — PC must stay on | Supported — start PC remotely |
Input feel | Noticeable lag, gesture loss | Low latency, Mac-native feel |
Cost | Free | Free tier available / Pro version |
Chrome Remote Desktop earns its place as an entry-level tool. Its ease of use and zero cost make it a great starting point for quick file access, occasional light tasks, and situations where budget is the overriding factor.
But if you're using a remote desktop regularly — for work, creative projects, or gaming — the accumulated frustrations of keyboard conflicts, always-on power requirements, and performance caps start to outweigh the convenience of free.
When that point arrives, DeskIn is the obvious next step: a tool designed from the ground up for people who need remote access to actually feel like working locally. Whether you're at your apartment, in a café in Kichioji, or somewhere further afield — your Windows machine should feel like it's right in front of you.
Experience professional-grade performance now — [Download DeskIn free and try it]

DeskIn vs Chrome Remote Desktop: Which One Fits Your Workflow Best?
When it comes to remote access tools, the comparison between DeskIn and Chrome Remote Desktop often comes down to one simple question: do you just need quick access, or do you need performance and control?
Both tools are reliable, secure, and widely used. But they are built for very different types of users. Chrome Remote Desktop focuses on simplicity and accessibility, while DeskIn is designed for users who need high performance, stability, and advanced features across multiple devices.
If you're deciding between the two, this guide breaks down not just what they offer, but which one actually fits your workflow.
Feature | DeskIn | Chrome Remote Desktop |
|---|---|---|
Performance | Up to 4K 60FPS/2K 240FPS, low latency | Standard performance |
Ease of Use | Requires app installation | Browser-based, very simple |
Device Support | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Works via Chrome browser |
File Transfer | Fast and stable | Limited |
Multi-device Management | Yes | No |
Mobile Experience | Optimized for iPad & iPhone | Basic |
Security | Privacy screens and granular black/whitelists | Basic |
Price | Free + paid plans | Completely free |
In short, Chrome Remote Desktop is great for quick, lightweight access, while DeskIn is built for users who expect more from their remote desktop experience.


Chrome Remote Desktop is one of the simplest remote access tools available. It runs directly through the Chrome browser and requires only a Google account to get started. This makes it especially popular among casual users and those already working within the Google ecosystem.
It works particularly well on devices like Chromebooks, where everything is already browser-based. It's also accessible across platforms, including mobile devices like iPhone and iPad, though the experience on mobile can feel limited compared to desktop use.
If you're wondering how to use Chrome Remote Desktop, the process is straightforward. You install the Chrome extension, sign in with your Google account, set up a PIN on the host device, and then connect from another device using the same account. The entire setup usually takes just a few minutes.
That said, simplicity comes with trade-offs. Chrome Remote Desktop lacks advanced features like high frame rate streaming, multi-monitor control, or professional-grade file transfer. For occasional access, it works well. But for more demanding tasks, users often start to feel its limitations.
👀You may also be interested in:

If Chrome Remote Desktop is a lightweight sketch, DeskIn is a full workstation painted in high resolution. DeskIn focuses on performance, stability, and flexibility. It supports up to 4K 60FPS streaming, making it suitable for tasks where visual clarity and responsiveness matter, such as design work, video editing, or even gaming.
As a Chrome remote desktop alternative, unlike browser-based tools, DeskIn is a dedicated remote desktop application. While this requires installation, it unlocks a much more stable and feature-rich experience. Users can manage multiple devices, transfer large files efficiently, and enjoy smoother control across different platforms.
DeskIn is also optimized for mobile workflows. Whether you're using an iPad or smartphone, the interaction feels more responsive and closer to a desktop experience, rather than a simplified viewer. For users who find Chrome Remote Desktop "good enough" at first but limiting over time, DeskIn often becomes the natural upgrade path.
The real difference between these two tools becomes clear when you look at how they perform in everyday scenarios.
If you only need to check files on your home computer or help a friend troubleshoot something quickly, Chrome Remote Desktop is more than enough. It's free, easy to set up, and doesn't require installing extra software beyond Chrome. In this case, DeskIn may feel like overkill.
For professionals working remotely on a daily basis, stability and efficiency matter much more. This is where DeskIn starts to stand out.
Tasks like editing documents, managing multiple screens, or transferring files between devices become smoother and faster. Chrome Remote Desktop can handle basic workflows, but it often struggles with responsiveness and lacks the tools needed for a seamless work environment.
This is where the gap becomes impossible to ignore. DeskIn's support for high resolution and high frame rates makes it suitable for visually demanding work. Whether you're editing videos, working with design software, or running simulations, performance consistency is critical. Chrome Remote Desktop, on the other hand, is not designed for these scenarios. It works, but not comfortably.
If you rely heavily on Google services or use a Chromebook, Chrome Remote Desktop integrates naturally into your workflow. It's lightweight, requires no additional setup, and feels like an extension of the browser itself. In this scenario, it remains a very practical choice.
Mobile usage highlights another important difference. While remote desktop Chrome iPhone, and Chrome Remote Desktop iPad are functional, they often feel like simplified versions of the desktop experience. Controls can be less intuitive, and performance may vary depending on the connection.
DeskIn, by contrast, is designed with cross-device interaction in mind, offering a smoother and more responsive mobile experience.
👀 You may also be interested in:
Yes. Tools like DeskIn offer better performance, more features, and improved stability, especially for professional use cases.
No, Chrome Remote Desktop is still actively maintained by Google. It continues to receive security updates and remains available for users needing simple, free remote access.
Yes, DeskIn is a legitimate remote desktop solution. It uses encryption to secure connections and provides access controls, making it safe for both personal and professional use.
When comparing DeskIn vs Chrome Remote Desktop, the choice depends on how demanding your remote access needs are. Chrome Remote Desktop is simple, free, and ideal for occasional use, especially if you just need quick access to a device without extra setup.
As your workflow becomes more intensive, the limitations start to surface. DeskIn offers a smoother, more stable experience with better performance and control, making it a strong long-term Chrome remote desktop alternative for users who rely on remote access every day.

聯絡我們
電子郵件: support@deskin.io
總部: 991D Alexandra Road #02-17, Singapore 119972
聯絡我們
電子郵件: support@deskin.io
總部: 991D Alexandra Road #02-17, Singapore 119972
聯絡我們
support@deskin.io
991D Alexandra Road #02-17, Singapore 119972